Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0401503), the National Materials Genome Project of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0100106), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11675255).
Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0401503), the National Materials Genome Project of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0100106), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11675255).
† Corresponding author. E-mail:
During the past decades, Li-ion batteries have been one of the most important energy storage devices. Large-scale energy storage requires Li-ion batteries which possess high energy density, low cost, and high safety. Other than advanced battery materials, in-depth understanding of the intrinsic mechanism correlated with cell reaction is also essential for the development of high-performance Li-ion battery. Advanced characterization techniques, especially neutron-based techniques, have greatly promoted Li-ion battery researches. In this review, the characteristics or capabilities of various neutron-based characterization techniques, including elastic neutron scattering, quasi-elastic neutron scattering, neutron imaging, and inelastic neutron scattering, for the related Li-ion-battery researches are summarized. The design of in-situ/operando environment is also discussed. The comprehensive survey on neutron-based characterizations for mechanism understanding will provide guidance for the further study of high-performance Li-ion batteries.
Energy storage has been one of the major worldwide concerns over the past decades. Due to the advantage of high energy density, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have become the dominant energy storage devices for micro-electronic products since 1990s.[1–5] LIBs with higher energy density and lower cost are needed to further meet the requirement of large-scale energy storage, such as smart grids and electric vehicles. The researchers from both industry and scientific community are paying attention to the optimization and design of high-performance LIBs.[6–9] Since LIBs are essentially electrochemical cells which are composed of electrodes and electrolyte, understanding the physical/chemical nature of these components as well as the internal electrochemical process and degradation mechanism of LIBs is a prerequisite for breakthroughs on their electrochemical performance.
During the past years, various advanced characterization tools, such as synchrotron-based x-ray diffraction/spectroscopy/microscopy, (scanning) transmission electron microscopy, etc., have played a critical role in promoting the mechanism understanding for LIBs.[10–14] Among all the probes, neutron-based characterization techniques have unique advantages due to the complementary scattering cross-sections of neutron compared to those of x-ray and electron. Specifically, neutron is more sensitive to light atoms (e.g., H, Li, O) than x-ray/electron and has the ability in distinguishing the neighboring elements (e.g., Ni, Mn, Co). On the other hand, neutron has strong penetrability which is favorable for the nondestructive in-situ/operando measurement of commercial LIBs. Based on these characteristics, neutron-based characterization techniques, including neutron powder diffraction (NPD), neutron pair distribution function (NPDF), small angle neutron scattering (SANS), neutron reflection (NR), neutron imaging (NI), neutron depth profile (NDP), quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS), and inelastic neutron scattering (INS), have made great contribution to the fundamental research and industrial application of LIBs.
Here, we present a review of recent progress in neutron-based characterization for Li-ion battery research (Fig.
Superior properties, including higher energy density, higher power density, longer cycle life, lower cost, higher safety, better eco-friendly, etc., have become the development goals for the next-generation LIBs. Achieving all these goals makes it essential to find better electrode and electrolyte materials as well as to design a more optimal battery cell. Although numerous optimization strategies have significantly advanced the overall performance of LIBs, in-depth insights of their performance-related mechanisms are needed to further guide Li-ion battery fundamental research and commercial applications. The intrinsic characteristics of LIBs determine that the challenges associated with electrochemical performance are mainly focused on the following aspects: battery materials, electrochemical reactions, and cell fabrication design.
The Li-storage capability of LIBs is closely associated with the structural stability of the electrode materials. For instance, the development of high-capacity cathode materials, such as high-voltage LiCoO2, Ni-rich ternary transition metal (TM) oxides, and Co-free Li-rich TM oxides, largely enhances the energy density of LIBs. However, the unfavorable structure evolution (e.g., irreversible phase transition) of these cathode materials upon the (de)lithiation process limits their cycle life.[15–18] The similar scenario could also be found in silicon or silicon/carbon composite anodes which show much higher specific capacity than that of traditional graphite materials.[19] Specifically, the large structure and volume changes induced by the alloying reaction of Li with silicon usually lead to the mechanical failure of the electrodes and make it difficult for silicon or its composite electrode to achieve both ultrahigh capacity and good cycle stability. In addition, the thermodynamic and electrochemical/chemical stabilities of the liquid electrolyte with respect to the cathode and anode materials have important effects on the cycle life and safety of LIBs. Upon the charging/discharging processes, there are always inevitable side reactions, that is the formation of solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer, on the interface between the electrodes and electrolytes. Since the SEI layer is electronically insulating, a uniform and dense passivating SEI layer would retard the further oxidation or reduction of the liquid electrolytes, and thus promote the surface stability of the electrodes.[20,21] Usually, the uncontrolled growth of the SEI layer would also not only cause constant consumption of the electrolyte but also lead to large electrode polarization for the electrochemical reactions. This meanwhile illustrates why the surface modification engineering of the electrodes as well as the optimization of the liquid electrolytes is always significant.[20,22–25]
Rechargeable LIBs with Li metal as the anode, usually also called Li-metal batteries, can obvious improve their energy density. However, safety problems caused by the growth of Li dendritic seriously restrict the practical application of Li-metal batteries, though lots of modification strategies have significantly advance the improvement of their overall performance.[26,27] It is worth noting that the application of solid-state electrolytes (i.e., all-solid-state batteries) has been regarded as one of the most effective strategies to enable the application of Li-metal anode. Nowadays, many kinds of solid-state electrolytes, such as glasses and glass ceramics, Li6PS5Cl and isostructural compounds, Li14Zn(GeO4)4/Li4−xGe1−xPxS4 and their analogues, NASICON and garnets-type oxides, have been developed, and their ionic conductivity was also significantly improved by various optimization methods.[28,29] It has been reported that the interfacial instability between Li metal and solid-state electrolytes is the main challenge to be overcame for all-solid-state batteries. Furthermore, the ionic conductivity of the solid-state electrolytes is still needed to be further improved to meet the high-power-density requirement for all-solid-state LIBs. In addition, although the configuration for LIBs (consist of only cathodes, anodes, electrolytes, and several electrochemical inert components) is deceptively simple, it is critical to carefully combine these components to achieve the superior overall performance mentioned at the beginning. In the process of solving the above challenges and propelling the development of high-energy-density Li-ion batteries, neutron-based characterization combined with the state-of-the-art in situ/operando methods has played an important role.
Powder diffraction is a typical characterization tool to observe the crystal structure information for polycrystalline materials. Since most electrode and electrolyte materials in LIBs are well crystalline, NPD has been widely used for their crystal structure analysis. NPD relies on the coherent-interference pattern (i.e., Bragg peak) that is scattered from well-defined lattice planes in polycrystalline materials. The phase composition, microscopic stress, structure distortion, lattice defect, atomic occupation, and even modest dynamical information (e.g., Li-ion diffusion pathways) of materials can be obtained from the measured NPD patterns. The accuracy of these structure information is highly dependent on the resolution of the diffractometer as well as the refinement process. It also should be noted that the introduction of proper isotopes, such as 7Li, in the samples can improve the overall quality of the measured NPD data. In addition, compared with other neutron-based characterizations, NPD technique has the advantage of essential simplicity, which makes it the prime candidate for in-situ/operando researches of LIBs.
The electrochemical performance of cathode materials is closely correlated with their crystal structure. NPD plays a critical role in deciphering their structure–property relation. Take commercialized LiFePO4 electrode material as an example, the intriguing correlation between its crystal chemistry and rate capability is clearly revealed by NPD. Using NPD, Delacourt et al. for the first time provided the experimental evidence of a solid solution LixFePO4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) at high temperature (450°C), and two new metastable phases with compositions Li0.75FePO4 and Li0.5FePO4 at room temperature.[34] They also demonstrated that these metastable phases pass through another metastable phase, that is Li∼0.67FePO4, during the cooling process.[35] NPD results indicated that the Li–O bond in Li∼0.67FePO4 is longer than that in LiFePO4, the discrepant bond length results in the metastability of the intermediate phase as well as the two-phase mechanism in the LiFePO4 system.[34,35] Since the rate capability of the LiFePO4 electrode is associated with this metastable phase, the understanding of its transition mechanism is favorable for improving the power density of LiFePO4 material. In addition, NPD characterization also made a breakthrough in visualize the Li-ion diffusion path in LiFePO4. By combining high-temperature NPD with the maximum entropy analysis method, Nishimura et al. presented experimental evidence for a curved one-dimensional path for Li-ion migration.[36] This important experiment result not only verifies the previous computational predictions, but also highlights the effect of Li-Fe anti-site defect on the one-dimensional migration channels. Based on the advanced NPD technique, numerous researches regarding the impact of synthesis method, heteroatom doping, composition, and particle size on the anti-site defect, were conducted, which is of great importance for the development of high-performance LiFePO4 electrode.[35,37,38] Lots of new polyanion-based cathode materials, such as LiMxFe1−xPO4 (M = Mn, Co), fluoride-phosphates (Li2MPO4F, M = Fe, Mn, Co, Ni), etc., were developed in the meantime thanks to the NPD characterization.[39] Besides the high-safety olive positive electrodes, NPD also made vital contribution to the development of high-voltage spinel electrodes and high-energy density layered cathode oxides. Using NPD, Liu et al. suggested that the occurrence and degree of Ni/Mn disordering are closely related with the formation of oxygen vacancies in LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 samples, and researchers found that the transition-metal ordering in LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 is determined by the synthesis process.[40] For the reaction mechanisms in spinel LiMn2O4, by employing operando NPD, Song et al. proposed that there are solid-solution regions within both cubic and tetragonal spinel phases other than a continuous phase transition between them.[41] Similar to that in olivine-type cathode materials, cation mixing is the most recognizable intrinsic defect type in the layered cathode oxides, especially in Ni-rich layered oxides, the existence of which has tremendously hindered the cycle stability and rate capability of the electrode materials. Using NPD, Zhao et al. systematically studied the impact of synthesis method and elements doping on the Li/Ni mixing in layered cathode oxides.[42–44] Also, a research work conducted by Li et al. suggested that the halogen substitution could facilitate the neighboring Li and Ni atoms to exchange their sites and form the stable local octahedron of halide, thus enhancing the electrochemical performance of the Ni-rich layered cathode.[45] For elucidating the structure evolution and reaction mechanism of layered cathodes upon the de-/lithiation process, operando NPD is a powerful tool. For instance, using operando NPD, Goonetilleke et al. indicated that a higher Ni content in Li(NixMnyCoz)O2 (x + y + z = 1) will lead to greater structure change upon cycling,[46] while Chen et al. revealed the underlying phase transformations mechanism which is responsible for the initiation and intensification of particle cracking in the Li-rich layered oxides.[47] In addition, NPD advanced the structure and mechanism revelations of many new positive electrode materials for LIBs.[30,48,49] Zhao et al. demonstrated the robust oxygen framework structure of cation-disordered Li-rich cathode oxides upon the de-lithiation process (Fig.
As a powerful tool, NPD largely favors the fundamental study of solid-state electrolytes. The intrinsic crystal structure of solid-state electrolytes as well as their Li-ion conductivity and dynamic can both be reliably evaluated via NPD. Due to the excellent chemical/thermal stability and good electrochemical inertness against Li metal, Li oxide garnets with cubic structure have been considered as the promising candidates for solid-state electrolytes in Li-ion and Li metal batteries. To study the phase-formation process of Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) and provide an in-depth understanding for its fabrication procedures, in situ NPD was applied in the research work conducted by Rao and co-workers (Figs.
Understanding the aging behavior, such as the thermal stability, fatigue processes, storage degradation, etc., of commercial LIBs is significant for the optimization of the cell manufacturing technology. NPD combined with in-situ/operando experiment method has been the typical characterization tool for the aging mechanism study of commercial LIBs.[32,63–66] Paul et al. studied the aging behavior of commercial 18650-type Li-ion battery which consists a LiFePO4 cathode and a graphite anode based on either meso-carbon microbeads (MCMB) or needle coke (NC).[63] Different from the inferior cycle stability and storage capability of the NC-based battery, the cell based on MCMB anode showed only 8% relative capacity loss after 4750 cycles and no capacity loss on storage for two years. The in situ NPD results suggested that the loss of active lithium should be responsible for the capacity loss in both cells and no other aging evidence such as the structure degradation of the electrode materials was detected.[63] The similar fatigue mechanism was also found by NPD in a commercial 18650-type cell based on LiCoO2 cathode in the research work conducted by Dolotko et al.[66] Interestingly, Lee et al. found that the loss of active lithium is also the main reason that results in the inferior energy storage capability of the commercial battery.[65] For the thermal stability of commercial battery, Baran et al. probed the structure response of the electrode materials in a broad temperature range 4–360 K via high-resolution NPD.[64] They suggested that there is an obvious effect of the temperature on the equilibrium states of electrode materials during de-/lithiation process. Meanwhile, Goonetilleke and co-workers studied the relation between cycling history and structural evolution in a commercial 26650-type battery using operando NPD (Fig.
Local (or short-range) structure of electrode materials usually has significant effect on their performance. As mentioned above, NPD, in which only Bragg peaks are considered, is applied to analyze the average (or long-range) structure of materials. Neutron total scattering, including both Bragg and diffuse scatterings, combined with pair distribution function (PDF) analysis method is a powerful tool to detect the structure of materials on a local scale. In this regard, NPDF is of great importance for the structure studies of nano materials, amorphous materials, or polycrystalline materials without good crystallinity. Different from NPD technique, NPDF, which is Fourier transformed from the neutron total scattering data, directly detects the structure information of materials in the real space. The real-space structure information, such as the interatomic distances, atomic coordination numbers, etc., of materials can be observed from the NPDF spectra. Specifically, the PDF peak position, intensity, width, and attenuation represent the average separation of atomic pairs, the coordination number, dynamic disorder, and structural coherence, respectively. Similar to NPD data, NPDF data can also be refined using a “small box” (unit cell) or “big-box” (supercell) model to obtain more detailed and accurate structure information.
Based on the advantage of NPDF in exploring the local structure of electrode materials, numerous significant researches regarding local structure of LIBs have been conducted. For typical layered transition metal cathode materials, such as LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2 and LiNixMnyCozO2, a local ordered structure easily forms in the transition metal layer due to the difference of cationic radius and their valence states. By employing NPDF, Grey’s group systematically studied the cation ordering structure in layered cathode oxides and their correlation with electrochemical properties.[72] NPDF analysis indicated that there are differences in the local transition metal arrangements between Li(Ni0.5Mn0.5)O2 and Na(Ni0.5Mn0.5)O2, suggesting the effect of alkali metal ions on the arrangement of the transition metal layer in layered oxides.[72–74] It was also found that Mn atoms tend to be surrounded by Ni atoms in the first coordination shell, and Ni/Mn cations show a clear preference for ordering in zigzags rather than in chains in the second coordination shell in Li(Ni0.5Mn0.5)O2 (no Li atoms in the transition metal layer).[72] Furthermore, by selecting 6Li(NiMn)0.5O2, 7Li(NiMn)0.5O2, and 7Li(NiMn)0.5O2 enriched with 62Ni as the model compounds (10% Li/Ni disordering), NPDF analysis revealed that the different M–O bond lengths (1.93 Å for Mn–O and 2.07 Å for Ni/Li–O) are ascribed to the considerable local distortions in the layers. Reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) calculations of the NPDF patterns indicated that there is a short-range ordered structure (so-called “flower structure” or “honeycomb-like structure”) in the transition metal layer which is comprised of LiMn6 and LiMn5Ni clusters.[73] For ternary layered cathode oxides, by employing NPDF, RMC calculations, and 6Li MAS NMR, Grey and co-workers suggested that their local environment and short-range ordering are easily influenced by the composition of the materials.[74] NPDF data displayed that there is a nonrandom distribution of Ni and Mn cations in the transition metal layers, where Mn atoms tend to be surrounded by Ni atoms while Co atoms tend to randomly distribute in the first coordination shell. Also, it should be noted that this local ordered structure is directly correlated with the electrochemical reaction mechanisms.[74] In addition, using NPDF tool, Idemoto et al. reported that doping or preparation process will affect the local structure, thus determine the electrochemical performance, of ternary layered cathodes.[75,76] For instance, compared with Li(Mn1/3Ni1/3Co1/3)O2, the worse cycle stability of Li(Mn1/3Ni1/3Co2/9Al1/9)O2 is associated with the varied stacking of the transition metal layers which is induced by the partial substitution of Al for Co.[75] Meanwhile, they found that there is also a difference, such as the precise locations of Li and O, between the average and local structures of high-capacity Li-rich layered cathode oxides.[77] It was reported that the substitution of Al in the spinel LiMn2O4 will obviously increase its structure stability and cycle performance.[78] To reveal the mechanism, NPDF was performed for the structure study of LiMn2O4 and LiMn1.8Al0.2O4. It was observed that the distortion parameter of AlO6 was smaller than that of MnO6, highlighting the role of Al substitution in mitigating the distortion of the metal-oxygen octahedra.[78]
In addition, NPDF played a critical role in promoting the understanding of lattice oxygen redox (l-OR) mechanism in Li-rich cathode oxides. Since l-OR is essential for achieving the ultrahigh capacity in Li-rich cathode oxides, understanding the oxygen lattice evolution upon oxygen redox is of significant importance. Neutron total scattering, which can detect both local and average structures and is sensitive to light oxygen atoms, is undoubtedly a suitable tool for the research mentioned above. Using ex situ NPDF, Zhao et al. studied the oxygen lattice evolution of Li1.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13O2 at different electrochemical states.[79] NPDF and NPD data indicated that, during the l-OR process in Li-rich layered oxides, no obvious average structure change was detected but a significant local oxygen lattice distortion was observed (Fig.
As a complementary scattering technique to NPD and NPDF, SANS detects the structure of materials at larger length scales, from 1 nm to micron sizes. The SANS tool is usually used to provide the size and shape information of materials on the nanometer scale. Within the approximation of SANS, Q simplifies to Q = 2θπq / λ. Usually, the SANS Q range is typically from 0.001 Å−1 to 0.3 Å−1, below this range is often called ultra-small-angle scattering and above this range is well known as wide-angle scattering. Of course, no hard boundary is defined between them. A suitable model is critical to obtain the accurate structure information during fitting the SANS spectra. Although the particle shape and size (or size distribution) are often the desired structural information, they are not easily solely extracted from the polydisperse systems. Since the spherical object model has the simplest analytical formula for the form factor among all the geometry objects, such as cylinder model, disk model, etc., it has been widely used in SANS data analysis.
The characteristics of SANS make it a powerful method to understand the complicated electrochemical processes, including the formation of SEI, microstructure evolution, etc., occurring in rechargeable LIBs. The SEI in Li-ion battery system has a great importance effect on the electrochemical performance and safety. Based on the advanced SANS technique, several researches have been conducted to explore the formation mechanism, chemical nature as well as the morphology and size evolution process of SEI in LIBs. By employing the time-resolved in situ SANS tool, Bridges et al. reported a work aiming at presenting a better understand for the electrochemical processes occurring on ordered mesoporous hard carbon anode upon the electrochemical cycling (Fig.
Owing to the mechanical flexibility and thermal stability, high-molecular-weight polymers combined with Li salts have attracted much attention as the solid-state electrolytes. However, their relatively low ionic conductivity at room temperature and low lithium ion transport number limit the performance of the cell containing high power density. Thus, the revelation of their structure–property relation is significant for improving their performance. Bergfelt et al. reported a series of deuterated tri-block copolymers and used SANS to study their bulk morphology at various temperatures, confirming the lack of microphase separation in the electrolytes.[89] SANS data showed that the peak evolution, in intensity and q-position, was fully reversible with temperature, which excluded any reordering of the copolymer toward any more thermodynamically stable morphology.[89] In the meantime, operando SANS was used to investigate the suitability of Li-metal batteries based on solid single-ion diblock copolymer electrolyte as safe batteries using lithium metal anodes.[90] In addition to the polymer electrolytes, SANS also advanced the structure understanding of NASICON glass-ceramics and aqueous electrolytes. Specifically, based on the SANS data, Vizgalov et al. demonstrated that the improved ionic conductivity of Y-doped glasses originated from its sudden crystalline upon heat treatment and formation of uniform Li1+xAlxGe2−x(PO4)3 ceramics (Fig.
SANS has also been widely used for the nanostructure as well as surface structure research of electrode materials. Chung et al. directly demonstrated that the antisite exchange defects are distributed in a highly anisotropic manner near the surfaces of LiFePO4 crystals by combing SANS and scanning transmission electron microscopy (Fig.
NR, as a powerful tool, is widely used to probe the structure and kinetics at and close to the interfaces of materials. Within certain constraints, the NR measurement can obtain the scattering characteristics beneath a surface by detecting the reflected intensity as a function of angle. The total reflection would occur above a critical angle (representing Q), and below which, each layer interface would produce an oscillating reflected amplitude with period ΔQ = 2π/T, where T is the thickness of the layer. Usually, in a NR experiment, the variation of sample composition within the depth of the sample is the desired information, which can be extracted from the scattering-length density profile. The scattering-length density is the sum over the number density of each isotope at a certain depth, times its bound coherent neutron scattering length. Similar to the SANS data analysis, establishing a suitable fitting model for the measured NR signal is also of great significance to obtain the accurate results.
As a complementary and similar technique to SANS, NR has also been demonstrated highly effective for investigating the in situ growth and evolution of SEI layer in LIBs. Specifically, NR not only can detect the porosity, structure, and chemical composition of the SEI, but also is sensitive to its structure and composition gradients as well as the thickness.[95,99] Owejan et al. designed an in situ NR measurement of the SEI layer as a function of the potential in a working lithium half-cell.[95] NR data indicated that, after a series of potentiostatic holds, the SEI thickness of 4.0–4.5 nm for 10–20 CV cycles grew to 8.9 nm (Fig.
Another important application of NR technique is to study the electrochemical reaction mechanisms, such as the Li permeation,[104–106] lithium storage,[107,108] lithium transport,[96] etc., of LIBs. Considering the characteristic of NR measurements, a special ultrathin/film electrode or cell setup is usually essential. Amorphous silicon has been considered as the most promising candidate anode due to its ultrahigh theoretical specific capacity of almost 4000 mA·h/g. Pre-lithiation of silicon is an effective strategy to modify the cycle performance of the silicon anode. Understanding the Li permeation behavior through amorphous LixSi layers is significant for the pre-lithiation engineering. For the measurements of Li permeation, a multilayer structure consisting of five [Si/natLiNbO3/Si/6LiNbO3] units which was produced by ion beam sputtering was designed in the research conducted by Erwin and co-workers (Fig.
As is well known, the interaction between the electrode and electrolyte has a significant effect on the electrochemical performance of LIBs. Thus, it is important to investigate their surface/interface structure evolution. By employing in situ NR, Browning et al. probed the thickness and scattering length density profile of the electrode–electrolyte interface for the high-voltage cathode LiMn1.5Ni0.5O4 at the open circuit voltage and fully delithiated states (Fig.
Neutron imaging, usually also called neutron radiography, is a nondestructive technique which can visually reveal the bulk structure information of materials. The basic principle of NI technique is to use the attenuation change of neutron beam in the intensity when it passes through the sample, observing the perspective image of the measured object. With the improvement of the spatial and temporal resolution of the detectors as well as the development of various computational methods, some advanced NI techniques, such as Bragg-edge imaging, three-dimensional tomography, phase-contrast imaging, etc., are allowed. Take Bragg-edge imaging as an example, its spatial resolution is higher than the traditional NI method though there are some challenges for its experiment measurements and data analysis. As a complementary technique to NPD, NPDF, SANS, and NR, NI is often widely performed to detect the macroscopic dynamic and chemical information within LIBs. In addition, similar to NPD, NI, especially for its in situ measurements, is also usually used for the research of commercial batteries.
Understanding the electrochemical behavior of lithium ions, including the Li-ion transport, Li-ion spatial distribution, and Li-ion concentration evolution, upon the cycling process is of great significance for the optimization of the overall battery performance. Due to the strong neutron attenuation of 6Li as compared to 7Li, NI has been considered as a powerful and direct tool to study the above fundamental scientific questions correlated with lithium. Using NI, Owejan conducted a continuous measurement of through-plane Li-ion distribution in an electrochemical cell with the composite graphite as the negative electrode.[117] The measured NI results indicated that the lithium distribution within the graphite electrode is presented as a function of the state of charge. Zhang et al. studied the Li-ion spatial distribution within V2O5 electrode in a small coin cell by neutron computed tomography.[118] They found that the Li-ion spatial distribution is inhomogeneous in the electrode, and a relatively higher current rate would result in a more non-uniform Li distribution after the insertion process of lithium ions. This phenomenon indicated that the Li-ion diffusion in the electrode is usually dependent on the cycling rate upon the lithiation process.[118] In the meantime, Zhang and co-workers probed the spatial distributions of Li ions in electrochemically delithiated Li–Mg alloy electrodes and observed the Li concentration profiles along the thickness direction.[119] For the Li-ion concentration evolution, Siegel et al., using the in situ NI technique, quantified it at various states of charge in a LiFePO4 pouch cell battery (Fig.
NI also played an important role in understanding the manufacturing process, such as the filling of liquid electrolyte, of Li-ion battery cells.[114] Since the electrolyte filling during the cell production process will directly determine the electrochemical properties as well as the safety performance of the cell, providing an insight into the filling process is significant. Using NI, Knoche and co-workers visualized the soaking behavior of electrolyte liquid within the battery during the filling and wetting process (Fig.
As mentioned at the start of this section, Bragg-edge imaging, due to its high resolution, has attracted wide attention in the battery research. The Bragg edges originated from the diffraction of the neutrons by crystals are usually obtained in the transmission spectra as a function of neutron wavelength by the pulsed neutron transmission method.[115] The lattice spacing and the surface density of the corresponding crystalline material can be reflected from the position of the Bragg edge and the depth of the edge, respectively.[115] In this imaging method, the results of surface density are not influenced by neutron absorption as well as neutron scattering. Through the Bragg edges analysis, Kino et al. gained the two-dimensional imaging of electrodes during the charging and discharging process (Fig.
Differ from the above neutron-based characterization techniques, NDP is a quantitative analytical tool which is commonly used to detect the elements that exhibit a high probability of absorbing neutrons as a function of depth. Based on this characteristic, NDP technique is allowed to directly probe the lithium nuclei by the capture reaction of neutrons with the 6Li isotope to form an α-particle (4He) and a triton (3H) according to 6Li + n →3H (2727.9 keV) +4He (2055.5 keV). In this capture reaction, the produced particles, i.e., 4He and 3H, would lose part of their kinetic energy when passing through the sample before reaching the detector that is housed in a high-vacuum chamber. Thus, the depth of the capture reaction can be reconstructed by measuring the residual energies of the emitted 4He and 3H particles. Meanwhile, through comparing the number and residual energies of the particles against a standard sample, the concentration distribution versus depth from the surface can also be calculated. Normally, for a well-defined homogeneous layer, the spatial resolution of NDP is on the order of tens of nano-meters.
The above working principle of NDP determined that it is a perfect tool for the analysis of the lithium-ion diffusion, concentration distribution, and reaction rates as a function of depth, which opens a large range of opportunities including the research of alloying reactions, Li metal plating/stripping, and (de) intercalation mechanisms in LIBs.[124,125,128–133] For instance, by employing operando NDP, Zhang et al. directly observed the Li-ion concentration profiles in the LiFePO4 electrode and revealed that the rate-limiting step is dependent not only on the morphology of the electrodes but also on the cycling rate itself.[128] Liu et al., using in situ NDP, studied the onset of lithiation in a high-capacity Sn anode, specifically, Li atoms first enriched on the surface and then propagated into the bulk of the Sn anode.[124] The decreased coulombic efficiency upon delithiation process was ascribed to the removal of Li near the surface which originated from the trapped Li within the intermetallic material (Fig.
For the degradation or aging mechanism research of LIBs, NDP also played an important role. In the research work conducted by Nagpure et al., NDP was applied to study the aging mechanisms of LiFePO4-based lithium-ion batteries that are designed to be aged at different rates to different states of charge.[134] The cycling rate as well as the state of charge has an obvious effect on the Li concentration profile. It was also found that although the Li concentration profile changed along the length of the electrode from the outer edge to the core of the cylindrical cell, it remained constant along the height of the electrode. Other than the above data, lots of quantitative parameters correlated with the lithium concentration profiles for anode and cathode were also provided by NDP.[134] Due to the essential difference of electrolyte between the classical liquid electrolyte cells and all-solid-state batteries, the aging or degradation mechanisms in all-solid-state batteries are also different. For further understanding of the aging behavior in all-solid-state batteries, by introducing operando NDP, Chen et al. conducted a research regarding the degradation mechanism of all-solid-state thin film Si–Li3PO4–LiCoO2 batteries (Figs.
Solid state electrolytes are promising to replace the traditional liquid electrolytes and work with Li metal safely because of their nonflammable and well mechanical properties. However, the poor contact between the electrodes and solid-state electrolytes as well as the uncontrolled interface dendrite growth limit their practical application. Thus, understanding of the solid-state electrolyte interface mechanism is of great importance for the development of all-solid-state LIBs. In this regard, NDP combined with the in situ experiment method shows its ability in studying the interface behaviors and Li dendrite growth phenomenon of solid-state electrolytes. For example, Wang and co-workers, utilizing in situ NDP, investigated the interfacial behavior of garnet solid-state electrolyte in contact with metallic Li upon the Li plating/stripping processes.[136] Specifically, in their research work, two types of all-solid-state batteries, one is symmetric Li/garnet/Li cells, the other is asymmetric Li/garnet/carbon-nanotubes cells, are designed to emulate the behaviors of Li metal and Li-free Li metal anodes, respectively. NDP data indicated that there is a limitation for Li-free Li metal anode to form a reliable interfacial contact.[136] In the meantime, by employing time-resolved operando NDP, Han et al. revealed the origin of the dendrite formation in three types of solid-state electrolytes according to the dynamic evolution of Li concentration profiles.[137] Their research results indicated that there are no apparent changes in the lithium concentration in LiPON, while a direct deposition of Li inside the bulk of Li7La3Zr2O12 and amorphous Li3 PS4 was observed. The diverse Li deposition behaviors suggested the effect of electronic conductivity of different solid-state electrolytes on the Li dendrite formation.[137] For the carbonate electrolyte gel polymer with LiNO3 addictive, Liu et al., using operando NDP, demonstrated its positive role in stabilizing the Li-metal plating.[127] NDP data revealed that when LiNO3 electrolyte additive and the gel polymer approach are used in conjunction, their effects are complementary in increasing the density of the plated Li, reducing the inactive Li species, and reducing the overpotential (Figs.
As a direct way to study ion dynamics with neutrons, QENS method is based on the small energy exchanges between the diffusing particles and the scattered neutrons, which usually cause a broadening of the elastic peak. The QENS technique can provide dynamic information on the 0.1–100 nm length scale with characteristic time on the order of 10−9–10−12 s, which corresponds to energy transfers on the order of 1 μeV to 1 meV. Differ from the quasi-elastic broadening, INS peaks usually arise at higher energy. Specifically, inelastic peaks are associated with a periodic motion, and the forces controlling this motion are stronger than those that would define a more diffusive motion. Generally, INS technique amounts to “vibrational spectroscopy with neutrons”, which is usually employed to study the local structure and vibrational dynamics of materials.
QENS, as a powerful tool, has been widely used to study the Li-ion conductivity behavior and ion dynamics in solid-state electrolytes. Using QENS, Maranas and coworkers studied the polymer dynamics in PEO-based single ion conductors.[138] In this conductor, anions are covalently bonded to a PEO spacer through a comonomer unit and only cations contribute to the conductivity. They conducted the experiment by comparing the effects of changing ion content on the dynamics of the polymer spacer in two cases. Specifically, according to the observed two dynamic classes of spacer atoms, they proposed that the fast [bridge] and slow [anchor] regions in the conductor are spatially segregated. QENS further determined the fraction of bridge and anchor atoms, and estimated their ionic compositions (Figs.
QENS was applied to study the Li transport in the highly defective amorphous LixSi anode materials (Fig.
The ion mobility and stability of lithium solid conductors play an important role in the electrochemical performance and life time of solid-state LIBs. Accordingly, providing guidance for the performance optimization of solid-state Li-ion conductors is essential. In the research work conducted by Muy et al., INS was used to study the correlation between the lithium ion mobility and lattice dynamics (Fig.
Furthermore, INS was used to study the surface phonons of electrode materials. For instance, by combining INS and first-principles ab initio simulations, Benedek and co-workers demonstrated that the structure of the surface of active materials differs from the interior of the particles.[148] In this research, LiFePO4 with/without carbon coating were selected as the model system, they found that the carbon coating would affect the Li–O bonding on the (010) LiFePO4 surface relative to the bulk.[148] These findings shed light on the relationship between the vibrations of atoms at the surface and electrochemical behaviors, such as lithium ion transport, charge transfer, and surface reactivity, of the active materials. Xie et al., using theoretical calculations and INS experiments, revealed the relation between the surface structure and Li-ion storage capacities of the functionalized two-dimensional transition-metal carbides or MXenes.[149] They suggested that the Li-ion storage capacities are strongly dependent on the nature of the surface functional groups, with oxygen groups exhibiting the highest theoretical Li-ion storage capacities.[149] For the Li-storage mechanism in carbon-based anodes, Papanek and coworkers using incoherent INS measurements and other characterization techniques found that the structural motif of disordered carbons is a planar graphene fragment, with edge carbons terminated by single hydrogen atoms, and random stacking between fragments.[150] Their research results are consistent with two reported mechanisms for Li capacity, one is partial charge transfer from Li to the carbons, the other is correlated with the C–Li bonding.[150]
Understanding the electrochemical reaction mechanisms, the atomic structure evolution as well as the structure/dynamic-function relations of LIBs is of great importance for making breakthroughs in their overall electrochemical performance, and fundamental to these is the study of battery materials during operation. Thus, in situ and even operando studies are commonplace and also essential in Li-ion battery research. As mentioned above, due to the high penetrability, neutron-based techniques are ideal for in situ/operando researches. Usually, the commercial cells or pouch cells cannot be directly applied in the in situ neutron-based characterization, and the battery component isotopic composition as well as the geometry of the cells needs to be specially designed to obtain the satisfactory results. For instance, due to the large incoherent neutron scattering cross section of hydrogen, deuterated electrolytes and special fluorinated separators are commonly used to reduce the incoherent background. In addition, limited by the difficulty of data analysis or the time-resolution of characterization tools, at present, the reported in situ/operando neutron scattering methods mainly focused on NPD, SANS, NR, NI, and NDP techniques.
Since the early research of a custom-made cell for in situ NPD was reported,[152] several cell designs, including coin-type cells, cylindrical-type cells, and pouch-type cells, have been developed to meet the requirements of in situ/operando NPD measurements. In the research works conducted by Rosciano et al. and Godbole et al., polyetheretherketone polymer and aluminum/titanium were used, respectively, to manufacture the compartment, where active electrode materials were encased, of in situ coin-type cells.[153,154] Due to the strong background and overlap of the diffraction peaks of the compartment with those of electrochemical active materials, it is not easy to observe the accurate refinement structure information during cell operation. To solve this problem, Bianchini et al. introduced the Ti–Zr alloy, which is transparent to neutron, in the in situ coin-type cell, and achieved the structural refinements of diffraction patterns upon the cell operation process.[155] Commonly, a large amount of active materials is essential to obtain a diffraction pattern with sufficient intensity in a reasonable measurement time in NPD experiment. Unfortunately, the large amount of loose powder in the in situ coin-type cell is not favorable for the electrochemical performance, such as cycle life, rate capability, etc., which directly restricts the in situ/operando battery research upon long cycles or at high operation rates. Cylindrical-type cells and pouch-type cells are suitable design strategies to overcome these challenges. Specifically, Sharma et al. designed an in situ 18650-type cell by rolling the positive electrode, separators, and lithium foil inside a vanadium tube,[156] while Roberts et al. and Brant et al. modified the design by closing a cylindrical cell (quartz or aluminum casing) with Swagelok-type metallic current collectors achieving high-rate cycling of the cell.[157,158] Furthermore, as shown in Fig.
To conduct the in situ SANS experiment, Möhl et al. developed a special in situ cell setup.[90] As shown in Fig.
A thin film electrode or thin film cell is usually needed to be constructed for in situ NR measurements. As shown in Fig.
As an important NI method, neutron computed tomography and 3D volume visualization have been widely reported,[118,119] and figure
For in situ NDP measurements, a microcell or thin film battery is often fabricated by sputtering and e-beam evaporation methods.[124,126,133] The prepared cell is usually placed inside the NDP vacuum chamber and connected to a combined potentiostat/galvanostat.[126,135] A typical in situ NDP setup and battery configuration are shown in Fig.
In summary, various neutron-based characterization techniques and the related progress regrading Li-ion battery research have been reviewed. The basic working principles, characteristics, and capabilities of these neutron scattering methods, as well as their in situ experiment design processes are summarized and discussed (Table
In addition, it was observed that each neutron scattering technique has its unique advantages and disadvantages for the Li-ion battery research. For instance, NPD can precisely provide 3D atomic level structure information, but limited only for the battery materials with good crystallinity and long-range structural order. NPDF method complements the disadvantage of NPD and can analyze the local structure of battery materials, whereas it shows limited real-space resolution and is hard to distinguish multiple components. For SANS, although it can work for the structure analysis of either crystalline materials or amorphous materials, its low-resolution data are usually difficult to be interpreted. It should be noted that SANS is a powerful tool for the SEI layer structure analysis. NR is sensitive to the surface/interface structure of materials, but the required comparatively large and atomically-flat surface is the main constraint for its measurements. As a powerful imaging tool, NI can present the visualized spatial structure information for battery materials, but its spatial resolution is only on the order of micron at present. NDP with the spatial resolution of nano-scale is very sensitive to the Li-ion concentration evolution with respect to the depth of battery materials, but its working principle limits its wide application for structure analysis. Compared with elastic neutron scattering techniques, QENS and INS can provide ionic dynamic and lattice dynamic information for battery materials. However, the lower time-resolution of QENS and INS restricts their in situ measurement development. Thus, it is necessary to know the limitations of each neutron-based technique and pay much attention to selecting proper methods to gain true insight in the active materials and battery cell. Furthermore, various neutron scattering methods provide characterization information at different length scales, ranging from atomic level, single crystal level, poly-crystal level, particle level to even cell level. A combination of multi neutron-based techniques can provide more comprehensive mechanism understanding for LIBs. Although there are still some intractable challenges for LIBs needed to be solved for the achievement of high-performance LIBs, it is worth believed that, with the development of advanced neutron-based characterization techniques and their continued improved resolution, more breakthroughs will be made for the Li-ion battery research.
[1] | |
[2] | |
[3] | |
[4] | |
[5] | |
[6] | |
[7] | |
[8] | |
[9] | |
[10] | |
[11] | |
[12] | |
[13] | |
[14] | |
[15] | |
[16] | |
[17] | |
[18] | |
[19] | |
[20] | |
[21] | |
[22] | |
[23] | |
[24] | |
[25] | |
[26] | |
[27] | |
[28] | |
[29] | |
[30] | |
[31] | |
[32] | |
[33] | |
[34] | |
[35] | |
[36] | |
[37] | |
[38] | |
[39] | |
[40] | |
[41] | |
[42] | |
[43] | |
[44] | |
[45] | |
[46] | |
[47] | |
[48] | |
[49] | |
[50] | |
[51] | |
[52] | |
[53] | |
[54] | |
[55] | |
[56] | |
[57] | |
[58] | |
[59] | |
[60] | |
[61] | |
[62] | |
[63] | |
[64] | |
[65] | |
[66] | |
[67] | |
[68] | |
[69] | |
[70] | |
[71] | |
[72] | |
[73] | |
[74] | |
[75] | |
[76] | |
[77] | |
[78] | |
[79] | |
[80] | |
[81] | |
[82] | |
[83] | |
[84] | |
[85] | |
[86] | |
[87] | |
[88] | |
[89] | |
[90] | |
[91] | |
[92] | |
[93] | |
[94] | |
[95] | |
[96] | |
[97] | |
[98] | |
[99] | |
[100] | |
[101] | |
[102] | |
[103] | |
[104] | |
[105] | |
[106] | |
[107] | |
[108] | |
[109] | |
[110] | |
[111] | |
[112] | |
[113] | |
[114] | |
[115] | |
[116] | |
[117] | |
[118] | |
[119] | |
[120] | |
[121] | |
[122] | |
[123] | |
[124] | |
[125] | |
[126] | |
[127] | |
[128] | |
[129] | |
[130] | |
[131] | |
[132] | |
[133] | |
[134] | |
[135] | |
[136] | |
[137] | |
[138] | |
[139] | |
[140] | |
[141] | |
[142] | |
[143] | |
[144] | |
[145] | |
[146] | |
[147] | |
[148] | |
[149] | |
[150] | |
[151] | |
[152] | |
[153] | |
[154] | |
[155] | |
[156] | |
[157] | |
[158] | |
[159] | |
[160] | |
[161] | |
[162] | |
[163] |